Learning at Home vs. in the Classroom: Exploring Self-Directed E-Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.6170

Keywords:

E-learning, Self-directed learning, Classroom learning, Active learning, Digital learning environments

Abstract

The rapid expansion of e-learning has sparked debate over whether learning environments, i.e. home versus classroom, affect academic outcomes when using digital materials. This study investigates the effectiveness of e-learning for undergraduate students by comparing two settings: (1) self-paced learning at home and (2) structured e-learning in a classroom. Participants were provided identical digital resources (lecture videos and a PDF textbook) and checked by engagement levels, learning outcomes, and satisfaction. Data were collected through surveys, online learning systems, and academic performance from over 500 students enrolled in an information science course as part of their general education requirements. Results reveal significant difference in learning time, with students in the classroom group spending less time than those in the home group. The classroom learning group also shows better degree of understanding, lower dropout rate, and higher level of satisfaction. The findings suggest that while e-learning can be equally effective in both contexts, the learning environment plays a crucial role in shaping student learning experiences. This study provides valuable insights for educators and institutions seeking to optimize e-learning instruction, particularly in the context of hybrid or fully online engineering courses.

References

Bredow, C. A., Roehling, P. V., Knorp, A. J., & Sweet, A. M. (2021). To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 91(6), 878–918. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211019122

Chang, J. Y.-F., Wang, L.-H., Lin, T.-C., Cheng, F.-C., & Chiang, C.-P. (2021). Comparison of learning effectiveness between physical classroom and online learning for dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Sciences, 16, 1281-1289.

Decman, M., Klun, M., & Stare, J. (2025). Online flipped classroom in university social science courses: Impact on student experience and success. Computers and Education Open, 8, 100261

Jaca, C. A., Gador, S., & Mangompit, R. M. (2024). Higher education students’ online class experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education and Practice, 12(3), 1068-1079.

Jeong, J. S., & Gonzalez-Gomez, D. (2021). A STEM course analysis during COVID-19: a comparison study in performance and affective domain of PSTs between F2F and F2S flipped classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669855

Lapitan Jr, L. DS., Chan, A. L. A., Sabarillo, N. S., Sumalinog, D. A. G., & Diaz, J. M. S. (2023). Design, implementation, and evaluation of an online flipped classroom with collaborative learning model in an undergraduate chemical engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 43, 58-72.

Müller, C., & Mildenberger, T. (2021). Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educational Research Review 34, 100394.

Núnez, M. E., García, P. M., & Abbas, A. (2023). The mediating role of self-regulation between emotional intelligence and student performance in online global classroom-based collaborative international online learning (COIL): Empirical evidence from four partner universities of Latin America. Research in Globalization 7, 100178.

Parkes, R. S. V., Langebœk, R., Wu, J., Hendrickson, D. A., Ciappesoni, J., & Lalèyê, F.-X. (2024). Responses to and reflections on clinical skills teaching and assessment during COVID-19: a global survey. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 51, DOI: 10.3138/jvme-2023-0073.

Shaffi, S., Tarek, S., & Watson, A. (2023). Enhancing business education through flipped classroom pedagogies: the systematic review. Creative Education, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.147094.

Shen, J., Zhang, S., Sun, D., Ge, R., Chen, S., Fang, J., & An, Q. (2025). Comparison of face-to-face teaching and online teaching in neurosurgery education for medical students. BMC Medical Education, 25, 232. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06817-4

Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Thomas, J. A., Lan, W. Y., Cooper, S., Ahern, T. C., Shaw, S. M., et al. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76, 93–135.

Van Doorn, J. R., & Van Doorn, J. D. (2014). The quest for knowledge transfer efficacy: Blended teaching, online and in-class, with consideration of learning typologies for non-traditional and traditional students. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 324.

Walsh, J. N. (2024). Using cluster analysis to identify procrastination and student learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The International Journal of Management Education, 22, 100936.

Weng, W., & Zheng, M. (2023). Comparison between powerpoint slides and videos in effectiveness for e-learning. EDULEARN23 Proceedings, 5887-5893.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Learning at Home vs. in the Classroom: Exploring Self-Directed E-Learning . (2026). International Journal on Social and Education Sciences, 8(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.6170