The Impact of Gamification on Motivation in Teacher Education: A Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonses.5980Keywords:
Gamification, Teacher education, Motivation, Meta-analysisAbstract
Gamification has been gaining increasing attention in the field of education. Although numerous empirical studies have been conducted across various educational levels—particularly in primary and secondary education—relatively few have focused on teacher education. Investigating the use of gamification in teacher training from is essential for synthesizing and clarifying inconsistent findings. The present meta-analysis examined the effects of gamification on motivation in teacher education. Jamovi was used to analyze eight studies published between 2011 and 2025, involving 743 participants in total. Based on the heterogeneity test results, a random-effects model was applied. Publication bias analyses (Fail-safe N, Kendall’s Tau, and Egger’s regression) suggested that the findings were robust. The results revealed that gamification had a medium positive effect on motivation in teacher education (Hedges’ g = .538, 95% CI [.159, .917], p < .001). Overall, the findings indicate that gamification is an effective pedagogical strategy for enhancing motivation in teacher education. The study provides empirical evidence and practical implications for teacher educators and policymakers seeking to promote motivational engagement through gamified learning environments.
References
Appova, A., & Arbaugh, F. (2018). Teachers’ motivation to learn: Implications for supporting professional growth. Professional Development in Education, 44(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2017.1280524.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
Buda, A., & Pesti, C. (2024). Gamification Solution in Teacher Education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 14, 1 - 15. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2024-0008.
Bueno-Baquero, A., del Olmo Muñoz, J., González-Calero, J. A., & Cózar-Gutiérrez, R. (2024). Gamificación, videojuegos y eSports en la formación inicial de docentes: Desarrollo del pensamiento computacional. Revista de Educación, 405, 65–92. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2024-405-628
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Jossey-Bass.
Dasoo, N. (2024). Influence of Gamification on Student Learning and Teacher Training. 2018 International Conference on Multidisciplinary Research. 56-67. https://doi.org/10.26803/myres.2024.05.
De Bona, M., Júnior, H., Ramos, D., De Sousa Araújo, F., & Rancan, G. (2024). Gamification and motivation in learning. RCMOS - Revista Científica Multidisciplinar O Saber. https://doi.org/10.51473/rcmos.v1i1.2024.486.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Ferriz-Valero, A., Østerlie, O., García Martínez, S., & García-Jaén, M. (2020). Gamification in physical education: Evaluation of impact on motivation and academic performance within higher education. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(12), 4465.
Gómez-Carrasco, C. J., Monteagudo-Fernández, J., Moreno-Vera, J. R., & Sainz-Gómez, M. (2019). Effects of a gamification and flipped-classroom program for teachers in training on motivation and learning perception. Education Sciences, 9(4), 299.
Guimerà-Ballesta, G., Fabre-Mitjans, N., Jiménez-Valverde, G., & Heras-Paniagua, C. (2025). Tailoring Gamification in a Science Course to Enhance Intrinsic Motivation in Preservice Primary Teachers. Education Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030300.
Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1-18.
Hernández-Ramos, J. P., & Belmonte, M. L. (2020). Assessment of the use of Kahoot! in face-to-face and virtual higher education. Education in the Knowledge Society, 21(1), 1-12.
Hornstra, L., Stroet, K., Rubie-Davies, C., & Flint, A. (2023). Teacher expectations and self-determination theory: Considering convergence and divergence of theories. Educational Psychology Review, 35(3), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09788-4
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
Hsu, H. C. K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159-2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w
Jaramillo-Mediavilla, L., Basantes-Andrade, A., Cabezas-González, M., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2024). Impact of gamification on motivation and academic performance: A systematic review. Education Sciences, 14(6), 639-655. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14060639
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
Knowles, M. S. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species (3rd ed.). Gulf Publishing.
Li, L., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Gamification enhances student intrinsic motivation, perceptions of autonomy and relatedness, but minimal impact on competency: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 765-796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10337-7
Paul, J., & Barari, M. (2022). Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how?. Psychology & Marketing, 39(6), 1099-1115.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ratinho, E., & Martins, C. (2023). The role of gamified learning strategies in student's motivation in high school and higher education: A systematic review. Heliyon, 9(8), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19033
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sailer, M., & Homner, L. (2020). The gamification of learning: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 77-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09498-w
Sánchez, R. M. (2023). Transforming online education: the impact of gamification on teacher training in a university environment. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research, (2), 15. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202347
Saprudin, S., Liliasari, L., Setiawan, A., & Prihatmanto, A. (2020). Optical gamification (OG); Serial versus random model to improve pre-service physics teachers’ concept mastery. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(9), 39-59.
Urhahne, D., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Theories of motivation in education: An integrative framework. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09767-9.
Saito, A. (2024). “I chose to receive teacher training because…” Motivations for teaching and career aspirations among teacher education students in Japan. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 100330.
The jamovi project (2024). jamovi. (Version 2.6.44) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
Yang, Q. F., Lian, L. W., & Zhao, J. H. (2023). Developing a gamified artificial intelligence educational robot to promote learning effectiveness and behavior in laboratory safety courses for undergraduate students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 18.
Yıldırım, I. (2017). The effects of gamification-based teaching practices on student achievement and students' attitudes toward lessons. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 86-92.
Yildiz, I., Topcu, E., & Kaymakci, S. (2021). The effect of gamification on motivation in the education of pre-service social studies teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TSC.2021.100907
Yuan, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2017). Exploring student teachers' motivation change in initial teacher education: A Chinese perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TATE.2016.10.010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal on Social and Education Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Articles may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Authors alone are responsible for the contents of their articles. The journal owns the copyright of the articles. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of the research material.
The author(s) of a manuscript agree that if the manuscript is accepted for publication in the International Journal on Social and Education Sciences (IJonSES), the published article will be copyrighted using a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license. This license allows others to freely copy, distribute, and display the copyrighted work, and derivative works based upon it, under certain specified conditions.
Authors are responsible for obtaining written permission to include any images or artwork for which they do not hold copyright in their articles, or to adapt any such images or artwork for inclusion in their articles. The copyright holder must be made explicitly aware that the image(s) or artwork will be made freely available online as part of the article under a Creative Commons “Attribution 4.0 International” license.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
